You should go read Ted Floyd’s post on the ABA Blog right now. It is pretty darn good and the conversation in the comments is worth reading as well, if only because a new term, “Schroedinger’s Gull,” has been introduced into the birder’s lexicon.
Recent Posts
Birding Bali Barat, Indonesia
By Kai PflugBirding Lodges of the World: Mosaic Lagoon Lodge, South Africa
By EditorFruit Eaters
By Clive FinlaysonThe Chemistry of Birds (15): Bird Feathers as Bioindicators
By Kai PflugThree Photos: Critically Endangered
By EditorThe Perils of Modern Birding Tours
By Kai Pflug10 Reasons Why Birds Win the Species Competition With Humans
By Kai Pflug
Posting Calendar
DAY | WRITER(S) | SERIES |
---|---|---|
MON | Kai (w) | Birding Lodges (w) |
TUE | Donna (m) Susan (m) Hannah (m) Fitzroy (m) | Bird Guides (w) |
WED | Leslie (bw) Faraaz (bw) | Ask a Birder (w) |
THU | Paul (w) | Birder’s Lists (w) |
FRI | David (w) | Species Spotlight (w) |
SAT | Peter (bw) Luca (bw) | From the Archives (w) |
SUN | Clive (w) | Three Photos (w) |
w weekly, bw biweekly, m monthly | ||
Any time: Jason, Mark, John, Sara, Rolf, Dragan |
See here for info on the writers.
Newsletter
Signup and receive notice of new posts!
Thank you!
You have successfully joined our subscriber list.
I love “Schroedinger’s Gull.” I’d like to see the introduction of quantum mechanics to bird identification expanded to include my own theory, which is that birders assume that a bird’s physical structure is stable, and this is not true! That warbler you’re trying to identify, the one that might be a Blackburnian? And then you blink and look again and realize it’s definitely a Pine? It’s not you~! The bird changed itself!