You should go read Ted Floyd’s post on the ABA Blog right now. It is pretty darn good and the conversation in the comments is worth reading as well, if only because a new term, “Schroedinger’s Gull,” has been introduced into the birder’s lexicon.
Recent Posts
- Birding Zaagkuilddrift RoadBy Peter
- Species Spotlight: Rose-ringed ParakeetsBy Peter
- A confusion of wagtailsBy David T
- The 12 Owls of ChristmasBy Editor
- My 10 Favourite Birds of Sri LankaBy Luca
- Review: Kingsyard Upside Down Double Suet FeederBy Susan Wroble
- Bird Friends at Rancho NaturalistaBy Faraaz Abdool
Welcome to 10,000 Birds!
Learn about our site and writers, advertise, subscribe, or contact us. New writers welcome – details here!
Beat Writer Posting Calendar
Monday
Kai Pflug (weekly)
Birding Lodges of the World
Tuesday
Donna Schulman (monthly)
Susan Wroble (monthly)
Hannah Buschert (monthly)
Fitzroy Rampersand (monthly)
Bird Guides of the World (weekly)
Wednesday
Leslie Kinrys (biweekly)
Faraaz Abdool (biweekly)
Ask a Birder (occasionally)
Thursday
Paul Lewis (weekly)
Birder’s Lists (weekly)
Friday
David Tomlinson (weekly)
Species Spotlight (occasionally)
Saturday:
Luca Feuerriegel (biweekly)
Peter Penning (biweekly)
Sunday:
Clive Finlayson (weekly)
Valters Videnieks (biweekly)
Any-Time Contributors:
Jason Crotty
Mark Gamin
John Hague
Sara Jentsch
Rolf Nessing
Dragan Simic
See here for info on the writers.
Newsletter
Signup and receive notice of new posts!
Thank you!
You have successfully joined our subscriber list.
I love “Schroedinger’s Gull.” I’d like to see the introduction of quantum mechanics to bird identification expanded to include my own theory, which is that birders assume that a bird’s physical structure is stable, and this is not true! That warbler you’re trying to identify, the one that might be a Blackburnian? And then you blink and look again and realize it’s definitely a Pine? It’s not you~! The bird changed itself!