Intermedius Lesser Black-backed Gull in Miami
By Charlie • August 23, 2008 • 4 commentsI was flicking through Sibley (not as painful as it may sound, by the way) in a recent idle moment and came upon the description of Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus which concludes with the paragraph, “Nearly all North American records are of the paler mantled Britain/Iceland population [graellsii]. A few records apparently refer to the darker Denmark population [intermedius], which has the same mantle-colour as Great Black-backed Gull [L. marinus] and relatively longer wings.”
I found this very interesting a) because I’m a bit anoraky and like that sort of thing, b) graellsii nests all around me in this part of the UK, and c) because of some photos I took in Miami some years ago that Sibley’s paragraph prompted me to look at again.
I took the photos below near Crandon Park in November. They clearly show a Lesser Black-back (the dark mantle, pale eyes, yellow legs, and heavily-streaked head confirm that - and the marks on the bill, worn coverts, and lack of primary tips suggest it’s probably a 3rd year bird), but I well remember at the time being struck by how large, bulky, and outright aggressive this particular Lesser Black-back was - I’d certainly not seen one that large for a while amongst the local graellsii, and while Lesser Black-backs are hardly shrinking violets, they’re not usually so dominant as this individual. The large size may be down to it being a powerfully-built female, but the very dark mantle - hardly contrasting with the wingtips at all - points very strongly to it being an intermedius.
Have a look and see what you think…(the birds in the background, by the way, are mainly Royal Terns and Laughing Gulls, and the young gull in the background of the second image is a Ring-billed)



I’m pretty certain this is an intermedius (of course feel free to disagree) and I’d be very interested if anyone could point me in the direction of a paper/article/website that looks at just how frequent this sub-species is in the US and where else it’s being seen. It seems surprising that the only Lesser Black-back I’ve seen in Miami should be a bird that has presumably flown even further than me to get there (and taken a lot more effort than me obviously), and I REALLY want to know what species the fish is that is being defended so strongly!
Comments would be very welcome…
Have you seen the cool 10,000 Birds t-shirts? Get yours today!












Any chance of some close-ups of the fish/
This bird looks practically identical to one I saw on the Outer Banks of NC this past February. It was a day on which I saw about 3 LBBGs and this individual was so much darker-mantled than the others I distinctly remember making a note of it. At the time, I took it to be the effect of the lighting, it was a bit cloudy, on how I was interpreting the mantle, but I suppose it was quite possible I was seeing intermedius.
I wonder whether they aren’t more regular but underreported due to the hesitancy some birders may have with making the call. Sometimes, it’s tough enough to get LBBG, let alone the more unusual subspecies. Though, LBBG are practically expected vagrants in NC anymore, as they are all up and down the east coast, maybe that will lead to more reports of intermedius.
“Gulls of the Americas” (which I won through this wondeful site) says…
“Similar overall to graellsii, but adult and older immatures have darker slaty gray upperparts, white mirrors and tips to outer primaries average smaller, and narrow whitish toungue-tips on P5-P7 average less indistinct.”
That being said, this bird looks very good for L.F. intermedius!
As for why this is not recorded more, coloration can be very difficult to assess sometimes. A Lesser Black-backed Gull standing in a group of say Iceland Gulls will look significantly darker than if it was standing with a group of Great-Black-backed Gulls. I also notice the term ‘average’ in the description which means there is likey some over-lap on coloration between the two forms, which will make some individuals difficult at best to seperate in the field. While no mention of it is made in my sources, I don’t see why the two forms couldn’t breed with one another, further complicating the Identification.
Plus Sibley is can very skeptical when it comes to certain ID’s in the field. Just because he didn’t see it, doesn’t mean the people who did are wrong…
Charlie, when in doubt (which you are not often) you can always refer to the Al Jaramillo.