This is all Dale’s fault, with his defection to team Dendroica just because he saw a couple’ colourful birds at the Biggest Week. Surely, they (the new world warblers) are more colourful than our warblers, but come on Dale, beauty is only skin-deep. I never thought Dale would be this shallow a guy. But the true blasphemy of Dale’s post is found in the comments section, where a commenter argues that the American wood-warblers should be simply called “warblers”, while our old world originals should be called “dull lil babblers”.
This is of course totally unacceptable, and just begs to be proven wrong, which is easy to do. All it takes is a closer look at an old world warbler, any old world warbler for that matter, let’s see, how about …
The shores of lake Bukhtarma in East Kazakhstan, with a heavy smell of warblers in the air
The Booted Warbler Hippolais / Iduna caligata
The Booted Warbler is a prime, fine example of an old world warbler of the Sylvioid clan, and I was happy to re-connect with it after many years in Bukhtarma, East Kazakhstan, in the landscape seen above. Within Kazakhstan, it is found widely and commonly in the northern half of this beautiful country. Additionally, you can find the Booted Warbler in the extensive online gallery of birds.kz, which comes in handy when you don’t have immediate plans of visiting the northern half of Kazakhstan.
Here are a few pictures to illustrate the splendid avian wonder that will be the focus of this post and my means of showing Dale just how wrong he really is.
An unusually unobscured look at a Booted Warbler – note the beautiful variability in the different shades of tea-with-milk colour
The lateral view adds a firework of brownish impressions to the overall dazzling appearance of the bird even on dull days
Of course, just the showing-off of a spectral rainbow in brown doesn’t make you a warbler per se. It is an important prerequisite for sure, but the deciding factor of course is the warble in the bird’s song! Therefore, if the warble is what separates the wheat from the chaff, or the warblers from the would-be’s, it may be useful to quickly glance at the definition of “to warble”, as given in the Free Dictionary:
war·ble 1 (wôr b l)
v. war·bled, war·bling, war·bles
v.tr.
To sing (a note or song, for example) with trills, runs, or other melodic embellishments.
v.intr.
1. To sing with trills, runs, or quavers.
2. To be sounded in a trilling or quavering manner.
That is illuminating, right?
“Trills”, “runs”, “quavers”, “melodic embellishments”. Nice description of what should essentially be a sound that is a song, a melody that goes beyond insulting your ears, and is more than barely a means of locating a bird in dense vegetation.
Frankly, as I have shown plainly here, the Parulidae of the Americas don’t really excell at singing. No really, think about it: their song is a joke, especially compared to their plumage and – more importantly in the context of this post – compared to the songs our old world warblers are capable of delivering. Seriously, you don’t have to believe me, you might as well see for yourselves:
Here is a song of the fabulous Booted Warbler. Did you hear that? THAT, my friends, is a WARBLE.
And for comparison, here is the song of the Blackburnian Warbler, arguably one of the group’s most splendid representatives. Did you hear that? Well, me neither! THAT, my friends, is NOT a warble! So how can you claim these birds to be “warblers”? Not at all, that’s how.
After this compelling demonstration of a lack of warble in the wood-warblers’ songs, it should be clear that the wood-warblers of the New World are indeed ill-named, and undeserving to be called anything that has to do with warbling, or their vocalizations in general. Unless you’d be fond of searching for Wood-Whiners along the shores of lake Erie in May.
So what do we name the Parulidae?
Do we go with Dale’s suggestion of calling them Silly-Canaries?
Or do we follow the taxonomic approach to birding and name the wood-warblers according to their genetic relationships to other groups, e.g. as Sparrow-Buntings, or Tanager-Emberizids?
Or do we just fly to Kazakhstan, hide in a huge fallow field amongst the thistles and tall forbs, and listen very closely to the revealing song of the local Booted Warblers?
Song of the Booted Warbler vs. the Wood-Warblers
You keep singing that you are above me
Something you call song, but I confess
You’ve been cheepin’ where you shouldn’t have been cheepin’
Now Booted warblers are gettin’ all your best
These Boots are made for warbling, and that’s just what they’ll do
One of these days these Boots are gonna warble all over you
You keep braggin’ when you oughta be shamin’
You keep warblin’ when you shoulda shut up
Vocalizing when you oughta be just showin’
You are bright alright, but nothin’ beyond that yet
These Boots are made for warbling, and that’s just what they’ll do
One of these days these Boots are gonna warble all over you
You keep sayin’ that you are a warbler
But you keep tryin’ to steal my name in vain
Well, I just found me a brand new tune of warbles
And what I know you ain’t had time to learn
Are you ready Boots? Start warblin’!
Since we’re in a renaming sort of mood, I propose changing out New World wood-warblers to “would warblers”.
As in, “I would warble, but who needs a voice when you look this good”.
and in this post one can clearly see the dangers of excessive viewing of old world warblers. The sheer blandness of their plumage is such that it drives the mind to distraction…..
They keep saying yellow’s best for watchin’,
But brown makes better listnin’ that’s for sure.
If you got neck and back ache from the lookin’
Lie back and get an earful, that’s the cure.
I’m just relieved that our colonial cousins called the wood warblers wood warblers, as opposed to calling them wagtails, or cranes, or vultures, or slugs. I can just imagine the thirst crazed half starved colonists stepping off the boat and looking bleary eyed at a duck and going “Look, it’s a frog. Let’s call it an American Bison-badger”.
The distinguished New World birder appreciates the challenges and subtle nuances of wood-warbler songs just as the Old World birder appreciates the difference between milk and buff. Now lets argue between hummingbirds and sunbirds!
A ranger in a National Park once said to us “oh, that’s an LBJ” and then explained it meant “Little Brown Job”-in other words you call anything you can’t identify as LBJ! 🙂
@Nate: absolutely fitting. Now who do we know who could introduce this to the ABA and eventually AOU? Hmmmmm, … Nate, do you know anyone at the ABA?
@Tai Haku. And you haven’t even seen my Paddyfield Warbler pics yet!!
@Redgannet: cheers! And as a world birder, your voice counts!
@Duncan: Ha!! Okay, let’s cut’em this much slack, but not more!
@David: David, you got me with those hummingbirds. I solemnly declare defeat. Hummers are – hands down – better than sunbirds.
@Clare: well, that term is very popular in southern Africa with its many larks and cisticolas. I wonder if it could also be applied to the large brown Aquila eagles?
“the warble is what separates the wheat from the chaff”
Or the Willow Warbler from the Chiffchaff? 😉
rofl
@Stevethehydra. Ha!! And of course, it’s the warble that also separates the Ibe Chiff from the Sibe Chaff! 🙂
@Dale: you shouldn’t be on the floor laughing, you should be on the floor hiding your face in shame! 😉
@Duncan: I saw an American Bison-Badger the other day. It was awesome.
And Jochen, poor deluded Jochen. We really need to bring you back over here to the New World so you can once again lay eyes on even one of our bland wood-warblers, like, say, a Worm-eating Warbler. You would change your tune so fast that some would liken it to a, dare I say it, warble?
Also, having now experienced the “song” of a Great Reed Warbler I think I know where Yellow-breasted Chats came from. They are merely Great Reed Warblers who moved to the New World and became much more attractive, plumage-wise, while giving up some small margin of insane noises.
Your latest ABA and Queens bird wasn’t an American Bison-badger, it was a European Shrike-stork.
@Corey: are you absolutely sure you want me over in the States this year, where I would likely see 200+ new species for the year list? Absolutely certain? Come on, tease me some more!
And the song of Great Reed Warblers absolutely kicks butt! To even compare it to a Yellow-breasted Chat is punishable by law.
@Duncan: you should know that Americans are so spoilt by their easy-peasy spring warblers that they just can’t tell their Bison-badgers from their Shrike-Storks, or from warbler-tailed finch-tits for that matter.
@Jochen and Duncan: I thought bison-badgers and shrike-storks were lumped? I really need to catch up on my taxonomy.
@just Jochen: I will be invading Germany in August so I see no reason why you shouldn’t invade the U.S.
@Corey: I’ll give you a choice of five possible answers:
a) lack of time
b) lack of money
c) lack of Acrocephalus warblers in the US
d) all of the above
e) none of the above
Again, an old post, and again I abdicate. First of all, NO, hummers do not beat sunbirds. I would defend either family to the death–well, to the bruising. Second, it is too easy to choose the flashier side. I am moved that old-worlders appreciate these brown birds so much and have developed great skill in discriminating among the less popular shades. After all the fun of bickering, at the end of the day I hope we all try to love all birds as we try (but fail) to love our children equally. I’m sure you’d be thrilled to see some wood-warblers if you come to visit, and I’ll try to masticate my way through the tan section of my asian field guide.
Dale, your on the right track.