So here I am, innocently trying to figure out why we need both Earth Day and Arbor Day in the same week when yet another shred of my ecological innocence is torn asunder. No, it wasn’t the revelation that Arbor Day always falls on the last Friday of April in the U.S. that horrifies me. What made my jaw hit the floor was the folksy, dewy-eyed origin of Arbor Day, as recounted by the Arbor Day Foundation:
The idea for Arbor Day originally came from Nebraska. A visit to Nebraska today wouldn’t disclose that the state was once a treeless plain. Yet it was the lack of trees there that led to the founding of Arbor Day in the 1800s. Among pioneers moving into the Nebraska Territory in 1854 was J. Sterling Morton from Detroit. He and his wife were lovers of nature, and the home they established in Nebraska was quickly planted with trees, shrubs and flowers.
Morton was a journalist and soon became editor of Nebraska’s first newspaper. Given that forum, he spread agricultural information and his enthusiasm for trees to an equally enthusiastic audience. His fellow pioneers missed their trees. But, more importantly, trees were needed as windbreaks to keep soil in place, for fuel and building materials, and for shade from the hot sun.
Morton not only advocated tree planting by individuals in his articles and editorials, but he also encouraged civic organizations and groups to join in. His prominence in the area increased, and he became secretary of the Nebraska Territory, which provided another opportunity to stress the value of trees.
On January 4, 1872, Morton first proposed a tree-planting holiday to be called “Arbor Day” at a meeting of the State Board of Agriculture. The date was set for April 10, 1872. Prizes were offered to counties and individuals for planting properly the largest number of trees on that day. It was estimated that more than one million trees were planted in Nebraska on the first Arbor Day. (emphasis mine)
Sounds sweet, right? But these were the High Plains, part of a vast river of tallgrass prairie that flowed through the heart of what now comprises the United States. This was the Great American Desert which, while deemed “almost wholly unfit for cultivation,” supported endless hordes of bison as part of a finely tuned ecosystem. Arbor Day was nothing less than an assault on the prairie, a primitive act of pioneer terraforming designed to bend the land to human use. Suddenly, merely planting trees doesn’t seem so innocent, does it?
Today, Arbor Day is celebrated in every hemisphere of the world. Furthermore, tree planting has never been as fashionable, whether as a way to offset greenhouse gas emissions or to reclaim ravaged habitat. While the damage has already been done in Nebraska, there’s still plenty of harm erstwhile environmentalists can do in service to the trees. If you plan to celebrate Arbor Day this year or any other, act in accordance with these two ecological principles:
1. Plant trees where trees belong.
2. Plant trees that belong where you’re planting them.
Planting native trees in their proper habitat is indeed an altruistic act, no empty gesture at all but an investment in an magical future of ecological harmony. So if you’re over that Earth Day hangover, celebrate trees by taking back Arbor Day.
Another way to celebrate Arbor Day that’s perfectly consistent with 2008 AD, Web 2.0 values is to blog about trees then submit your post to the next edition of Festival of the Trees, which conveniently enough, I’ll be hosting. Let’s raise a grove, nay a colossal forest of Arbor Day erudition. This effort is not only inspiring and unlikely to get soil on your suit, but it will also have minimal impact on what fragments of Nebraska prairie still exist. Isn’t that an Arbor Day celebration we can all get behind?
It’s amazing how many times in what is our recent past us humans have managed to alter/destroy habitats with ‘introductions’ and ‘conversions’ done entirely to suit our tastes with no regard to the ecological requirements of the life already there. At least in the case of Arbor Day there does seem to be a positive outcome of sorts, but for every tree going up there are still a staggering number being chopped down for the “human good” – ‘bio-fuels v the Amazon rainforest’ anyone?
It’s a tough fight against exotic ornamental plants. People love the way that Japanese Maple or Chinese Privit looks, but don’t often think about the ramifications of planting a seed and fruit producer in their yard that’s as aggressive in its way as the House Sparrow evicting a Bluebird from a nestbox.
Plant trees, but plant the right trees. Natives are pretty too!
I’m going to stir the pot here and add that I don’t have all that much of a problem with people planting non-natives (as long as they stay clear of the super invasive stuff the likes of which Nathan mentioned) – there are plenty of options that look good and provide food/habitat for wildlife in the native pantheon (incidentally what is native in the US context – native to the continent? state? county?) but if people have room for one tree in their garden or a few street trees in their suburb and want it to be something else (like a nice fruiting apple they can enjoy the fruits of or a nice sterile flowering cherry) I’m fairly sure that’s still a win.
I posted an Audubon article last September that made some similar points. IN fact, the article went so far as to say “global warming” might actually get worse by unfettered tree planting.
http://www.iowavoice.com/2007/09/26/audubon-planting-trees-does-more-harm-than-good-re-global-warming-and-sustainable-development/
Combined with the fact that people often plant trees where trees don’t belong, and the curious fact that Mr. Morton really didn’t have any environmental background, and you start to wonder whether Arbor Day really is a day to be celebrated.
Living in Iowa (just east of Nebraska, for you non-Americans), I prefer the tall grasses. In fact, I have substituted trees as borders for prairie grass (Indian Grass, Switch Grass, and Big Bluestem). They are beautiful. Throw in some native coneflowers and you’ve got yourself a pretty cool and wild backyard. Plus, many of the birds and animals around here are better adapted to grassland than to trees.
I know what you’re saying, Tai. Plenty of nonnative trees contribute to the cycle of life. But if I’m speaking out in defense of native plants, I’ll have to support Nathan’s line about them being pretty too.
Moe, I know what you mean. A couple of years back, I had the privilege of visiting a slice of Illinois prairie and it was beautiful. Forests certainly have their place; they’re my favorite ecosystem by far. But grasslands are special in their own right and don’t need to be planted over!
Before I was a Native-Loving Blogger, I used to get trees every year from the “Arbor Day Foundation”. When I started learning about native vegetation, I looked at the list of trees that were being sent my way, and one of them was the Golden Raintree. One of the worse choices to make when planting trees here.
My disgruntlement with “Arbor Day” began then. Can’t they send NATIVE trees? A person who was not in the know would plant these things and have no idea that they weren’t really doing a whole lot of good for their local environment.
Hello Mike,
Thanks a lot for the great Festival #23.
Also enjoyed a lot your reflections on Arbor Day. Here in Brazil it is on September 21st.
See ya
I hadn’t read this when I submitted my little Arbor Day post to the carnival you mention. Worthy information that, while dismaying, is not too surprising. It ain’t exactly the most high-tech, well informed method, I admit, but I picked the type of tree to plant in my back yard based on the healthy presence of same in neighboring yards, and the fact that Pecan is the “State Tree” of Texas (plus I, the human interloper, like pecans). So, I guess that means, either I did OK, or the whole damn state is screwing up, like Nebraska did, which would be, again, dismaying but not too surprising.
I’ll have to check further into that.
Oh yeah. Thanks for having my post in Carnival #23. I’ll let you know what I learn about that.
According to the TX Dept. of Agriculture, pecans are SO native to TX, they were here when the Native Americans arrived. 🙂