One day my wildlife rehabilitator friend Marilyn brought me a black shoebox decorated with 6 or 8 quarter-sized holes. Energetically sticking his head out, then in, then back out a different hole was a vaguely sinister-looking brown bird, obviously outraged that someone had the nerve to put him in there. “He thinks he’s a cuckoo,” said Marilyn.
Harley the Starley was a young European Starling. He had two major strikes against him: one, he had been found and raised alone by someone with little knowledge of birds, and so was imprinted. Two, he was a starling, an aggressive, overly plentiful invasive species that are edging out our more gentle native songbirds. Some bird rehabbers won’t have anything to do with them; others love their extreme personalities. At that point all I saw was a bird in need.
Whatever, I think I said.
Knowing that sometimes imprinted birds can “wild up” if put in a flight with others, I released Harley into my larger flight. He ignored the other young starlings, got into a rolling-on-the-ground dogfight with a young Northern Mockingbird, then landed on the back of a Yellow-shafted Flicker and started pounding him on the back of the head. I quickly grabbed the little delinquent, put him in a spare parrot cage, and brought him into the house.
Soon afterward the kids, then eight and nine, “accidentally” let him out of his cage. He flew a couple of laps around the house, then landed on the floor and joined their Pokémon game (they’d set up action figures and Harley would knock them down, resulting in a complicated point system). No dope, Harley subsequently charmed every child who walked through the door, earning himself a place in the household – at least, until I could figure out what to do with him.
For over a month Harley flew around the house (don’t ask about my cleaning routine), hassling the parrots, sneaking up and pushing the wrong button when the kids were playing their Gameboys, sunning himself under the lampshades, and eating all the Egg Drop Soup when we ordered Chinese food. When he started changing into his adult plumage we took outside, where he had races with the kids and learn how to catch his own food (“Look, look, Harley, there’s a bug!” SNAP! He was a quick study.) He’d always come back inside, and spend the night in his parrot cage.
Then one day we were in the yard, and suddenly he was gone. We searched everywhere. This was not in the plan. He was familiar with birdfeeders, and knew how to catch insects; but I never release a single flock bird who has not grown up with members of its own kind. For days, we searched and called his name. I was mortified and filled with guilt. “But mom,” said my son finally, “he would have been so sad if we had kept him locked in a cage.”
This is the problem with rehabbing, there are all those shades of grey.
i do not like it when they disappear abruptly like that after they have shown they are going to stick around for a while, always get that sick feeling
maybe he found a new person, they kept him and he is living happily ever after
So you released a non-native bird into the wild? Shame on you.
RIck that was a jerky thing to say.
Starlings are the most delightful characters, after having one raised alone and imprinted on us I have never looked at them in the same light again. They are wwonderful little birds, opinionated, funny, pugalistic when they don’t get their own way and great companion birds. Ours would call the dog and sing Frosty the snowman,pull the hairs on the cats and poop all over the house. He loved to “ride the wrist” whenever I was doing something, he just had to be involved.
He died suddenly at just over a year old, leaving us bewildered and bereft.
They may not be “native” but they are a wonderful little bird and should be appreciated as a precious life.
Didn’t I already say that, Rick?
Nothing wrong with indoor pet starlings, Maren; they’re great in the house, if you like bird feces all over the place.
Sorry, Suzie; please replace my question mark with a period.
Hey Jodi, yeah, sometimes they end up escaping when they’re not supposed to be released, and this one ended up being released when he was supposed to stay. I live in the woods, so there are no starlings anywhere near me.
Maren, I agree they’re really smart and funny birds but they’re too aggressive, and there are too many of them! Not good for our natives.
Interesting that we draw a line and say birds that arrived here before this date are wonderful, ones that arrived after this should be exterminated.
i release them, and always will, they were introduced and they are here to stay, releasing a few every year will make no difference
if someone went to the trouble to bring me a baby one, i will not euthanize it just because it’s non-native
but when things start to fill up i do not take them after a certain point because i need to keep room for the natives
i won’t do english sparrows, just too many of them end up being found as babies, i pass them off to less experienced people who want to help but are not federally permitted to do native birds
i will always make room for non native pigeons, because I LOVE THEM!
It’s illegal in many states–among them MA and CA–to release European Starlings. I don’t know what the situation is in NY, but I do know that a committee there has recently submitted a report listing the species as among those to be regulated in the state.
If you doubt the wisdom of such laws, try googling “histoplasmosis,” or “eastern bluebird,” or “red-headed woodpecker.”
um where did you get that info, not true about massachusetts
“These animals must be obtained from a lawful source, may not be captured or taken from the wild in Massachusetts, and may not be liberated to the wild. (M.G.L. c. 131, § 23 and 321 CMR 9.01).” The European Starling is on the list.
http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/wildlife/living/keeping_wildlife.htm
you are misinterpreting the law, starlings go on my annual report every single year, i AM allowed to legally rehabilitate wild starlings and release them
Well, you’d know better than I would, as I haven’t seen the terms of your permit. But I would urge you to take the responsible course and stop releasing European Starlings, which is a serious disservice to the ‘wildlife’ you presumably ‘love’ nearly as much as feral pigeons.
there are starlings in my area already and have been for a over a hundred years
Heaven help us.
oh don’t get your panties in a bunch rick, rehabbers will always take care of the wild ones, if we choose not to dicriminate, thats our choice
many birds are aggressive and kill other smaller weaker birds
i have never had a bird that was injured by a starling, english sparrows, crows, hawks, gulls, bluejays, and grackles, but never a starling
“there are starlings in my area already and have been for a over a hundred years”
By that logic, Trap-Neuter-Release is an acceptable solution to the feral cat problem.
so how do think we should eradicate all non native species???
what do we do about the people? the worst of the non native species??
Rick, I will speak for myself, and not for any other rehabbers. I’ve taken in a couple thousand injured birds in 20 years of rehabbing. Number of starlings? About half a dozen. English sparrows? About the same. I ended up drawing the line with them. If your’re a really good and lucky rehabber, your overall release rate is 65-70%. Some of the unreleaseables can be placed in nature centers, most must be euthanized. This means taking an otherwise healthy bird, who you have worked on for weeks or months to return to the wild, to the vet and holding them while they die. Sometimes it’s not as pleasant. Have you ever had to kill a red-tailed hawk with a shovel because it was hit by a car, had mortal injuries, was in horible pain, it was a Sunday afternoon, and there was no vet available? No? Ok. Then don’t act as though “getting rid of” of any bird is an easy task, especially for those who dedicate a large part of their lives to trying to save them. Tell you what – give me your number, and when I get a non-native nestling, fledgling, or perhaps someone’s beguiling pet, I’ll call you, you can come pick it up, and you can kill it yourself. Deal?
Good gracious, you’re all just confirming my worst suspicions about most “wildlife rehabilitators.” Why not put all your good will, time, and money into saving habitat?
Grant, logic is out of place here, I fear.
what do you do rick?
and grant
how many birds are on your life list?
I agree with Rick.
I like starlings fine in that I have to accept that they’re here, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to help a wounded one.
Wow, what a discussion! I will not take in starlings or english sparrows.It takes so much time and effort to feed and raise birds that I will rehab only native songbirds.
Rick, I like bird crap all over my house, its decorative, and we sure do need more goverment regulation in our lives, California and New York, should be examples to us all, wanna try and get salt or a large drink in New York? Goverment regulation is just great we should all have more of it.
Grant, the feral cat release program is such a losing cause we should just have a goverment regulation to kill all of them, you and Rick could do it together, you’d love it. YOu could start killing birds too, that would get you out of your mothers basement and doing something for the habitat. IT would be nice to save habitat and have it all clean and pretty with nothing living there.
AS for me I will continue to save as many lives as I can even if it not considered a “desirable” life. I will help the handicapped and the crippled, re-home them if I can, keep them for the rest of their lives if I cannot, luckily I have only had to kill a couple of those whose injuries were beyond help. This was disgusting and broke my heart, do you take pleausre in killing the undesirable Rick? because the rest of us do not.
Instead of being critical,give those who give their lives in service some credit and even better, a donation to cover the costs of saving lives. But you won’t do that will you, beacuse life is not sacred to you like it is to us.
and Rick, if you showed up at my house and were in need, I would even help you. I will feed and shelter any one who needs it, I have done it before many many times, and though I would probably think you are a douche, I would feed and care for you too, without question or hesitation.
Good gracious, Rick, I fear that you are one of those overly opinionated and self-important people who go around telling others what they should do with their lives. You get a thrill out of putting tiresome vacation photos on a website and telling the world about your eating habits; I get a thrill out of helping a wounded bird of prey. Mea culpa – I’ve helped a half dozen starlings in my life. Shoot me.
Fellow rehabbers – let’s not keep this going, ok? If Rick tells us he actually does something to help the environment, fine, then we might have an actual discussion. If not, then what’s the point?
Suzie, thanks for inspiring such a spirited discussion. I love the fact that the issue of starling rehab and release has so many valid perspectives.
I do have to insist that everyone take a civil tone here. Reasoned and impassioned responses are always welcome, but we can do without snide remarks. As far as I can tell, most if not all the current commenters are nature lovers and conservationists. Let’s remember that we’re all on the same side of caring a great deal more than the average citizen about wild birds. This particular issue might highlight our differences, but that’s because, as Suzie pointed out, it is so rare and weird.
@Jodi: I’m not sure that it’s relevant, but I’m a software developer, and my ABA list is at 580.
No, I’m not a wildlife rehabber, but I actually have great respect and appreciation for those who are. I’ve only corresponded with Suzie a little, but I think she can attest to that. In fact, in my review of her book, I wrote:
“I suppose that I knew intellectually how tough it is to be a rehabber. But it never sank in until I read Flyaway. But it also has its rewards, and it is a service that is vitally needed.”
The real issue here is the problem with non-native species. And this is a problem without a good, viable solution. I don’t wish ill on any individual starling, feral cat, etc. It’s not their fault they are here. However, they are here and, more importantly, are a real problem for native species. Something has to be done to protect the native species, many of which are in real danger.
I wish that the solution could be non-lethal. I really do. But I don’t see how that is possible. These feral cats, pythons, rats on islands, and all the other invasives should not be allowed to roam free. But there’s not enough homes or shelters for them. That doesn’t leave a lot of choices, unfortunately.
That may sound insensitive, cruel, or what have you, but the sad fact is that we have to put the native, threatened species over the introduced ones that are causing them harm. So while I don’t have any problem with a rehabber helping a starling (honestly, I would have a hard time refusing any bird if I were in that position), I do not think that they should be released.
Hi Grant!
Yes, I remember our correspondences very well.
You make valid and thoughtful points – I really do agree with everything you’re saying.
Mike, you’re right. Thanks! You’ve given me an idea for another post. I hope you had a great trip.