My colleague leavesnbloom over at the Nature Blog Network posted a really useful and cogent look at Copyright and Plagiarism. I learned quite a bit from it. If you’ve got a blog that you want to protect from scrapers, aggregators, and outright content thieves, you’ll want to read this ASAP!
Recent Posts
- Bird Guides of the World: Tom Tarrant, AustraliaBy Editor
- January in Morro Bay, CaliforniaBy Hannah
- Birding Dalat, Vietnam (Part 2)By Kai Pflug
- Birding Lodges of the World: Yacutinga Lodge, ArgentinaBy Editor
- January in GibraltarBy Clive Finlayson
- Three Photos: Woodpeckers in ShanghaiBy Editor
- A Big Year in Rotterdam – part IIBy Peter
Welcome to 10,000 Birds!
Learn about our site and writers, advertise, subscribe, or contact us. New writers welcome – details here!
Posting Calendar
DAY | WRITER(S) | SERIES |
---|---|---|
MON | Kai (w) | Birding Lodges (w) |
TUE | Donna (m) Susan (m) Hannah (m) Fitzroy (m) | Bird Guides (w) |
WED | Leslie (bw) Faraaz (bw) | Ask a Birder (w) |
THU | Paul (w) | Birder’s Lists (w) |
FRI | David (w) | Species Spotlight (w) |
SAT | Peter (bw) Luca (bw) | From the Archives (w) |
SUN | Clive (w) Valters (bw) | Three Photos (w) |
w weekly, bw biweekly, m monthly | ||
Any time: Jason, Mark, John, Sara, Rolf, Dragan |
See here for info on the writers.
Newsletter
Signup and receive notice of new posts!
Thank you!
You have successfully joined our subscriber list.
I’m not sure how much of a problem this is. I mean the kind of sites that rip content in order to sell advertising are easy to spot (even if you have adblocker on your Firefox, which you should!) and regular readers would invariably go to the actual source rather than some money-making knock off. It’s like mirrors of Wikipedia content – the real deal still gets most of the page views.
@Duncan: if you knew anything about recent German politics, you would be very sure of where the problem is! 🙂 😉